When the matter was taken up for hearing on 23.02.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be posted on 01.03.2017. On 01.03.2017 also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption, ''for dismissal''. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter further. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02.03.2017 Index:yes/no rn/tsi To
1.The Sub Judge, Thiruvallur.
2.The Judge, III Additional Family Court, Chennai.
Tr.CMP.No.107/2015 http://www.judis.nic.in