Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Bhoop Ram vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1031 of 1992 Revisionist :- Bhoop Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Anil Kumar Gupta,S.S. Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.,Radhey Shyam Shukla
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by judgment and order dated 28.04.1992 passed by Judge, Family Court, Bareilly allowing Misc. Case no.129 of 1991 in proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. And awarding maintenance of Rs.300/- per month to respondent 2.
3. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhoop Ram vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar Gupta S S Sharma