Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Bhagaji vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|13 April, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-135 of 2011 registered with Kalol City Police Station, Taluka- Kalol, District - Gandhinagar for the offence punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.
[2] It is submitted that by learned advocate for the applicant that charge sheet is filed. It is further submitted that alleged agreement to sell is cancelled and other co-accused are released on bail. It is also submitted that considering the nature of allegations and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.
[3] This Court has gone through the complaint. It is alleged that present applicant accused and complainant had joint ownership of disputed property. Applicant created alleged bogus agreement to sale in favour of the third party, by which the applicant intended to dispose of the property of himself as well as property of the complainant. The alleged agreement to sell is cancelled. Considering this facts and role attributed to the applicant and now the charge sheet is filed, without entering into the merits of the case, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this application deserves to be allowed.
[4] Hence the application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with C.R.No.I-135 of 2011 registered with Kalol City Police Station, Taluka - Kalol, District - Gandhinagar anagar for the offence alleged against him, on the applicant executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one solvent surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that -
a) he shall not take undue advantage of liberty or abuse liberty;
b) he shall not to try to tamper or pressurise the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner;
c) he shall maintain law and order and should cooperate the Investigating Officer;
d) he shall not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
e) he shall not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;
f) he shall furnish the address of his residence along with the proof to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;
g) he shall surrender passport, if any, to the lower Court within a week.
[5] If the breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned Court will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
[6] Bail before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
Direct service is permitted.
[M.D.Shah, J.] srilatha Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhagaji vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
13 April, 2012