Court No. - 4
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5243 of 2021 Petitioner :- Balveer Respondent :- Chief Executive Officer And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Samya Lal Pandey,Vidya Kant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Anjali Upadhya,Ramendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Eshita Sand Advocate holding brief of Smt. Anjali Upadhayay, learned counsel for the respondents.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not be issued to respondents.
The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer to issue a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Gautam Budhnagar to decide the injunction application 6 C filed in Original Suit No.1962 of 2019 (Balveer Vs. Greater Noida Authority and others) expeditiously.
It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that apart from the aforesaid suit, an stay application has also preferred by him for grant of interim protection. It is argued that the interim protection is urgently required and prays for early disposal of the stay application.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into merits of the case, the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is disposed of directing the Court below to pass appropriate orders on the aforesaid application filed by the petitioner expeditiously and preferably on the next date fixed. In case, on the said date on account of any reason, the said application could not decide, the court below will decide the same expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months thereafter.
Order Date :- 7.10.2021 saqlain