Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Baij Nath Saroj vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 45
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20241 of 2018 Petitioner :- Baij Nath Saroj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheo Ram Singh,Rajesh Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Babu Yadav
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Sri Rajesh Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there are certain defects in the writ petition and he seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file fresh petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 Pratima
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Baij Nath Saroj vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2018
Judges
  • Ajay Bhanot
Advocates
  • Sheo Ram Singh Rajesh Maurya

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.