Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Bai Kunthi Devi vs District Basic Education Officer And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33904 of 2002 Petitioner :- Smt. Bai Kunthi Devi Respondent :- District Basic Education Officer And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Sinha,Nagendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.K. Sharma
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
“(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the full and actual salary of suspension period and also the salary of 4 months- May, June, July, August, 1995 alongwith at the rate of 18% p.a.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also relief sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Bai Kunthi Devi vs District Basic Education Officer And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • P K Sinha Nagendra Kumar