Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Babloo vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 92
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52494 of 2019 Applicant :- Babloo Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Anita Singh,Nirmla Kumari,Prem Babu Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Ms Alpana Singha, learned counsel appearing for State and perused the record of the case.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is not named in the FIR. He is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive as well as other criminal cases. Further submission is that applicant was arrested on the confessional statement of co accused Mahesh and Inshad Ali on 4.6.2019 and the FIR vide Case Crime No. 146 of 2019, under Section 411,414 IPC was lodged against the applicant and three other co accused. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 04.06.2019.
Further submission is that the co-accused Inshad Ali has been admitted to the concession of bail by this Court in Case Crime No. 146 of 2019 by order dated 08.08.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.32104 of 2019. The applicant has also been admitted to bail by this Court in Case Crime No. 146 of 2019 vide order dated 23.09.2019 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 37398 of 2019.
Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment; as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Babloo be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in case crime No. 160 of 2019, under Sections 379, 411 IPC,P.S. Hathras Gate, District Hathras subject to following conditions:-
i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.
ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities; (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. It is further clarified that the trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019/RavindraKSingh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Babloo vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Varma
Advocates
  • Anita Singh Nirmla Kumari Prem Babu Verma