IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.5137 & 5141 OF 2009 C.R.P.No.5137 of 2009:
Between:
B.Mareppa Yadav, S/o. late B.Hanumanthappa and another ..... PETITIONERS AND S.Venkateswara Reddy, S/o. Sanjiva Reddy ....RESPONDENT C.R.P.No.5141 of 2009:
Between:
B.Mareppa Yadav, S/o. late B.Hanumanthappa and another ..... PETITIONERS AND S.Venkateswara Reddy, S/o. Sanjiva Reddy ....RESPONDENT The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.5137 & 5141 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER:
This Court ordered notice before admission in these two civil revision petitions on 10.11.2009 and granted interim stay for a limited period, which was further extended for a limited period.
2. Heard the learned counsel.
3. Civil Revision Petition No.5137 of 2009 is filed against the order, dated 06.08.2009, made in I.A.No.1082 of 2009 in C.F.R.No.1539 of 2009 in A.S.No.88 of 2008 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Kurnool. Likewise, Civil Revision Petition No.5141 of 2009 is filed against the order, dated 06.08.2009, made in I.A.No.1081 of 2009 in C.F.R.No.1538 of 2009 in A.S.No.87 of 2008 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Kurnool.
4. These applications had been filed for condoning the delay of seventeen days in re-presentation.
5. In the light of the facts and circumstances explained, this Court is of the considered opinion that instead of dismissing these applications the learned Judge could have condoned the delay. However, at this stage the learned counsel representing respondent would maintain that these applications had been thought of only with a view to further delay the hearing of the appeals.
6. In the light of the facts and circumstances, the impugned orders are accordingly set aside. Let these applications and also the appeals be disposed of by the learned Judge as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, the civil revision petitions are hereby disposed of as indicated above. There shall be no order as to costs.
P.S. NARAYANA, J January 20, 2010 MD