Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Arvind Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12809 of 2018 Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhanshu Srivastava
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Heard Shri Ashutosh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri O.P. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents no.2 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1.
The petitioner in the writ petition is seeking quashing of the order dated 24.03.2018 stated to have been passed by way of penalty.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the petitioner has a remedy of appeal under Regulation 21 of the U.P. State Warehousing Corporation Staff Regulations, 1961.
In this view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed to enable the petitioner to avail his remedy of departmental appeal.
Order Date :- 28.5.2018 N Tiwari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Arvind Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 May, 2018
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Ashutosh Tripathi