Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S.Aruna Hotels Limited vs The Superintendent Of Service Tax

Madras High Court|09 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the captioned writ petition has been rendered infructuous and therefore, he has instructions not to press the writ petition further.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Resultantly, the accompanying miscellaneous petition will, thus, stand closed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
09.02.2017 gg To The Superintendent of Service Tax, SIR-Gorup II, Office of the Commissioner of Service Tax, Service Tax Commissionerate, Newry Towers, 2054-1, II Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai  600 040.
W.P.No.1825 of 2014 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S.Aruna Hotels Limited vs The Superintendent Of Service Tax

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
09 February, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.