Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Arti And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 April, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 36
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5966 of 2017 Petitioner :- Arti And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Rekha Dikshit,J.
Heard Sri P.K. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri A.K. Sand, learned AGA for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to demonstrate before this Court the relationship of petitioner no.2, 5 and 6 to which he states that the present petition be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh petition mentioning the relationship of the said petitioners.
The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh petition.
Office is directed to return the certified copy of the FIR to the learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining a photocopy of the same.
(Mrs. Rekha Dikshit, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 19.4.2017 Gaurav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Arti And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 April, 2017
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Pankaj Kumar Shukla