Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Arshad vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 24
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46395 of 2017 Applicant :- Arshad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Faisal Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to F.I.R. four cases shown against accused applicant. The applicant is on bail in all cases shown against him. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no credible evidence against him. He is languishing in jail since 24.10.2017 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Arshad involved in Case Crime No. 628 of 2017, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Meerapur, District - Muzaffar Nagar be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-
i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.
iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.
iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission, of which applicant is suspected.
v) The applicant shall not directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade the applicant from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 28.11.2017 A. Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Arshad vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2017
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Mohammad Faisal Khan