Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Arockiasamy vs The District Collector

Madras High Court|02 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Jallikattu in the place mentioned in the petition, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.
2.Mr.D.Muruganandam, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.
3.It is seen from the records that on 21.02.2017 a representation has been given, but the same has not been considered. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.
4.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the first respondent viz., District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District is directed to look into the representation dated 21.02.2017 and dispose of the same within a period of two days.
To
1.The District Collector, Trichy District.
2.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District.
3.The Tahsildar, Srirengam Taluk, Trichy District.
4.The Inspector of Police, Ramji Nagar Police Station, Trichy District.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Arockiasamy vs The District Collector

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
02 March, 2017