Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Anurag Singhal vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 54723 of 2019 Applicant :- Anurag Singhal Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Prakash Srivastava,Pravin Kumar Tiwari,Pradeep Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Anurag Singhal with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 844 of 2019, under Sections 376, 323, 504 IPC, Police Station New Agra, District- Agra, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. It is submitted that age of the victim is 45 years.She has alleged that applicant has committed rape on her since last five years.The allegation is that applicant threatened the victim that if she does not obeys his direction, he will make her video viral.She is a married women.The age of applicant is also about 45 years and he is also married.The victim wants undue benefit from the applicant,therefore she has falsely implicated the applicant.She has admitted that applicant had supported her when her husband was ill. The applicant is languishing in jail since 13.11.2019, who is not a previous convict. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 18.12.2019 Atul kr. sri.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anurag Singhal vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 December, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Pravin Kumar Tiwari Pradeep Kumar Tiwari