Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Anupam Yadav And Ors vs State Of U P And Anr

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 237 of 2019 Applicant :- Anupam Yadav And 34 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA for the State.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking to quash entire proceeding including the charge sheet dated 18.05.2017 of Criminal Case No. 2505 of 2018 (State vs. Anil Kumar and others) pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah arising out of Case Crime No. 240 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 332, 353, 436, 341 IPC and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Baghwala, District Etah.
On perusal of the impugned charge sheet and the materials in support of the same, this Court does not find it to be a case which can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court cannot hold a parallel trial in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such ground appears to be available to the applicants, on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be quashed going by the settled law in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283.
Accordingly, the prayer for quashing the charge sheet and proceedings is refused.
However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 45 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
For a period of 45 days from today or till the applicants surrender whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
With the aforesaid directions, the application is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.1.2019 MN/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anupam Yadav And Ors vs State Of U P And Anr

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 January, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Kamlesh Kumar Singh