Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40758 of 2018 Applicant :- Anup Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Dulare Singh,Mayank Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
According to the prosecution case the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown person alleging that on 13.7.2018 Rs.15.40 lac was looted. During investigation, Rahul, Manish, Rajesh, Monu, Anoop and Bhura were arrested by the Police personnel and some looted rupees was recovered.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that co-accused Manish Chahar, Raj Kishore @ Rajesh, Narendra @ Bhura and Monu have been enlarged on bail by co-coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 26.9.2018, 4.10.2018, 22.10.2018 and 23.10.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 36587 of 2018, 37941 of 2018, 39913 of 2018 and 40120 of 2018 and the case of the present applicant is identical to the case of the co-accused, who have been enlarged on bail; hence the applicant is also entitled for the same benefit; the applicant is languishing in jail since 26.7.2018 (three months); having no criminal previous history; one case was roped after this incident; the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case; the name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Rahul; recovery shown by the Police is false; no identification of person and property was done; there is no independent witness and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that the applicant has no previous criminal history and his case is identical to co- accused- Manish Chahar, Raj Kishore @ Rajesh, Narendra @ Bhura and Monu, who have been enlarged on bail.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let the applicant Anup involved in Case Crime No. 479 of 2018, under Sections 395, 412, 120B I.P.C., P.S. Hariparvat, District Agra be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
1. The appellant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The appellant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The appellant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The appellant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The appellant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 26.10.2018 OP