Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Anmol Pathak And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 550 of 2019 Petitioner :- Anmol Pathak And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Dhyan Shanker Pandey
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners states that though appearance on behalf of opposite party no.2 has been put in by Sri Dhyan Shanker Pandey, however, no counter affidavit has been filed till date.
Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 may file counter affidavit within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List this case in the week commencing 22.07.2019.
Till the next date of listing, interim order, if any granted earlier, shall continue to operate.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 MN/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anmol Pathak And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Sudarshan Singh