Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Amit And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2261 of 2018 Revisionist :- Amit And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned AGA for the State.
The present criminal revision has been preferred against the order dated 24.5.2018 passed by the Additional District and Session Judge/Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Amroha, in Special Session Trial No. 72 of 2017 (State of U.P. Vs. Fakharuddin), arising out of Case Crime No. 277 of 2017, under Section 366, 368, 354 I.P.C., and Section 3(2)5 S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Adampur, District Amroha, pending in the court of Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Amroha.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionists have been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. on the apparently inconsistent testimony of P.W.-1.
Perusal of the order and annexures to the present application reveal that the applicants have been specifically named and specific role has been assigned to them.
Consequently, the present revision has no force and is accordingly dismissed. However, it is left open to the revisionists to avail all their remedies during trial.
Order Date :- 25.7.2018 Prakhar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amit And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2018
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Sanjeev Kumar