1.Challenge in the present Writ Petition is laid to the order dated 28.09.2015.
1.1. The issue raised in the Writ Petition, I am told by the learned counsel for the petitioner, is covered by the decision rendered on 06.02.2017 in W.P.No.7969 of 2014.
2. This position is affirmed by Mr.Kanmani Annamalai.
3.Furthermore, the learned counsel for the petitioner draws my attention to the impugned order, which is demonstrative of the fact that the respondent had reversed ITC in the sum amounting to Rs.98,45,031/-, out of which, the petitioner gave effect to reversal amounting to Rs.76,07,956/-.
3.1. The learned counsel for the petitioner, thus, submits that if this Court were to set aside the order, the relief would be limited to, what is demanded of the petitioner, i.e., a sum of Rs.22,37,075/-, unless this Court were to observe that the ITC reversal made by the petitioner in the sum of Rs.76,07,956/- can be adjusted in future years.
4.Mr.Kanmani Annamalai, who appears for the respondent says that the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is in order.
5.Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside. The petitioner is given liberty to take credit for ITC to the extent of Rs.76,07,956/-, albeit, in accordance with law.
6.The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.