Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 150 of 2006 Revisionist :- Ajy Chaurasia Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- S.T. Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Re: Crl. Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.51435 Of 2006.
None has appeared on behalf of the applicant. Learned A.G.A. is present for State/Opposite Party.
Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
There is delay of 142 days in filing the present revision and none has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application moreover grounds shown in the affidavit are not sufficient to condone the delay caused in filing the revision.
Accordingly, the delay condonation application is rejected.
Order Date :- 28.7.2021 MN/-
.
.
.
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 150 of 2006 Revisionist :- Ajy Chaurasia Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- S.T. Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Since delay condonation application has been rejected, consequently the revision is also dismissed.
Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 28.7.2021 MN/-