Heard both sides.
2.The grievance of the petitioner seems to be the correct plan has not been annexed with the decree and accordingly, the necessary application has been filed before the Court below to correct the mistake. However, the Court below negatived the application. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner preferred this Civil Revision Petition.
3.At request of both the parties, the concerned Court records were summoned. On a perusal of the Court records, it is found that the correct plan has been annexed with the decree and therefore, the grievance of the petitioner that the correct plan had not appended along with the decree as such cannot be accepted. It is further found that the grievance of the petitioner seems to be the wrong numbering of the plan concerned by the Court below. It is seen that the remedy for the same lies elsewhere and not by way of filing this Civil Revision Petition.
4.In the light of the above position, I do not find any error or mistake in the order of the Court below, when it is found as per the judgment and decree, the correct plan is annexed to the decree and resultantly, this Civil Revision petition is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no order as to costs.
To:
The First Additional District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai..