Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Ajmunnisa Waqf Alal Alad Trust Rep By Its Trustees No 97 And Others vs Vs M Chandran

Madras High Court|03 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.02.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA C.R.P.(NPD).No.217 of 2015
Date of Reserving the Judgment 31.01.2017
Date of Pronouncing the Judgment
03.02.2017
1. Ajmunnisa Waqf Alal Alad Trust Rep by its Trustees No.97, Coral Merchant Street Chennai – 1.
2. Mrs.Ajmunnisa No.97, Coral Merchant Street Chennai – 1.
3. Mrs.Razia Sultana No.97, Coral Merchant Street Chennai – 1.
4. Mrs.Badru Jahan No.97, Coral Merchant Street Chennai – 1.
.. Petitioners/Appellants/Petitioners -Vs.-
M.Chandran, Proprietor M/s.Sakthi Tailor No.99, V.M.Street, Mylapore Chennai – 4.
.. Respondent/Respondent/Respondent
Prayer:
Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 CPC to modify the judgment and decree dated 22.08.2014 passed in RCA.No.325 of 2006 by the learned IX Judge, (Rent Control Appellate Authority) Court of Small Causes, Chennai confirming the judgment and decree dated 06.01.2006 passed by the learned XVI Judge (Rent Controller) Court of Small Causes, Chennai in RCOP.No.182 of 2003 and allow the CRP by fixing the fair rent at Rs.3554/- per month.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.P.Ashok For Respondent : No Appearance [Mr.M.R.Murali]
O R D E R
The revision petitioners/landlord have come up with the present Civil Revision Petition challenging the fair and decreetal order dated 22.08.2014 made in RCA.Nos.325 & 91 of 2006 on the file of the learned IX Judge, (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Court of Small Causes, Chennai by confirming the judgment and decree dated 06.01.2006 made in RCOP.No.182 of 2003 on the file of the learned XVI Judge (Rent Controller), Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
2. The revision petitioners who are the landlord had filed the application in RCOP.No.182 of 2003 under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 for fixation of fair rent stating that the contractual rent for the demised premises was fixed at Rs.125/- per month and they sought to fix the fair rent at Rs.7360/- per month. The learned Rent Controller after considering the oral and documentary evidence had fixed the fair rent at Rs.2140/- per month from the date of filing of the petition. As against the said order of the learned Rent Controller, the tenant filed an appeal in R.C.A.No.91 of 2006 and the landlord filed R.C.A.No.352 of 2006. The learned Rent Control Appellate Authority by a common judgment dated 22.08.2014 had dismissed the appeals by confirming the fair rent fixed by the learned Rent Controller viz., Rs.2140/- per month, as against which the present Civil Revision Petition has been preferred by the landlord.
3. Heard the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Though the matter was periodically adjourned, there was no representation on behalf of the respondent.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners/landlord would submit that there is dispute only with regard to the land value. The landlord had filed document Ex.P.4/Sale deed, dated 15.07.1996 in which 324 sq.ft of land was sold for Rs.3,20,436/-. Hence, the land value in the year 1996 was Rs.23,73,600/- per ground. While so, the present petition for fixation of fair rent was filed in the year 2003 and hence, in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in (2004) 2 Supreme Court Cases 283, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Sahaswan v. Bipin Kumar and Another, appreciation at the rate of 15% has to be given for every subsequent year. Therefore, on giving 15% appreciation for every subsequent year from the year 1996 to 2003, the value of the land would be Rs.63,13,825/- per ground in the year 2003 and on the basis of the said amount, the fair rent had to be fixed. The learned counsel would further submit that there is no dispute with regard to any other aspect and hence, he prayed for allowing the revision.
5. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and perused the entire records.
6. As already stated, though sufficient opportunity was granted, there was no representation on behalf of the respondent. It is pertinent to note that except Ex.P.4/Sale deed, dated 15.07.1996, no other document has been filed. Further, on behalf of the respondent, even the respondent has not been examined and no document was filed. As per Ex.P.1/Report of the engineer, dated 16.02.2004, the value of the land is fixed at Rs.75,00,000/- per ground. As per Ex.P.4/Sale deed, dated 15.07.1996, an extent of 324 sq.ft of land was sold for Rs.3,20,436/-. Hence, the land value in the year 1996 was Rs.23,73,600/- per ground and after giving 15% appreciation for every subsequent year from the year 1996 to 2003, in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in (2004) 2 Supreme Court Cases 283, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Sahaswan v. Bipin Kumar and Another, the value of the land would be Rs.63,13,825/- per ground in the year 2003 and in the year 2004, it would be Rs.72,60,895/-.
7. Thus, considering the value stated in Ex.P.1/Report of the Engineer and Ex.P.4/Sale deed, I am of the view that it would be appropriate to consider the value stated in the sale deed of the year 1996 submitted by the landlord and after giving 15% appreciation for every subsequent year from the year 1996 to 2003, the value of the land could be arrived at Rs.63,13,825/-. It is also pertinent to note that there is no disputes with regard to any other aspects. Thus, the fair rent is calculated as follows:
Fair Rent Calculations
Cost of Construction
Ground Floor RCC shop area 162 sq.ft @ Rs.370/ per sq.ft 162 x 370 Rs.59,940/-
Staircase and FOL share 24.7 x 300 Rs.7,410/-
Rs.67,350/-
15% for basic amenities Rs.10,102/-
Since the petition premises is being used for non residential purpose, the fair rent is calculated is at 12% which comes to Rs.3067.97 rounded off to Rs.3050/-
8. In fine,
(a) The present Civil Revision Petition stands allowed and the fair rent is fixed at Rs.3050/- per month instead of Rs.2140/- per month, from the date of filing of the petition.
(b) Both the parties are directed to bear their own costs.
pgp
03.02.2017
R.MALA, J.
pgp
Pre-Delivery order made in C.R.P.(NPD).No.217 of 2015
Dated : 03.02.2017
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajmunnisa Waqf Alal Alad Trust Rep By Its Trustees No 97 And Others vs Vs M Chandran

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
03 February, 2017
Judges
  • R Mala