Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ajay Tiwari vs State Of U P Through Its Secretary

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13269 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ajay Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Its Secretary (Law), Govt And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Nandan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Mishra
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Siddharth Nandan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashish Mishra, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2.
The petitioner has filed this petition for a direction upon respondent no. 2 to disclose the marks obtained by him in the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Recruitment Examination-2018 Part-I and Part-II and to disclose the cutoff marks of the candidate in each category, on which select list has been made.
The petitioner can seek the aforesaid information by filing appropriate application under Right to Information Act, 2005 read with High Court Right to Information Rules, 2006.
The other prayer for framing rules as advised by the petitioner is completely misconceived inasmuch as, the recruitment has to be made according to the rules and the petitioner has no right that a rule should be re-framed in any particular manner.
In view of the alternative remedy so available to the petitioner, we dispose off the petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the said remedy.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 Ishan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajay Tiwari vs State Of U P Through Its Secretary

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Siddharth Nandan