Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ajay Kumar Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10711 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Pandey,R.V. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Amit Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.C. Pandey, learned counsel for the Power Corporation and Sri A.N. Mulla, learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been field with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the F.I.R. dated 17.1.2019 registered as Case Crime No. 10 of 2019 under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003, P.S. Rajapur District Chitrakoot.
From the perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein, prima facie, cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interfering in the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused.
However,considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the above mentioned offence is compoundable and the petitioner is ready to deposit the compounded amount, it is directed that in case the petitioner moves an application before the authority concerned within one week from today for compounding the offence, the authority concerned of the Electricity Department shall be summoned by the court concerned within two weeks thereafter for the purpose of submitting the compounding report.
The authority concerned shall submit the compounding report within 15 days thereafter. The petitioner shall deposit the compounded amount within three weeks thereafter. Upon receipt of the compounding report, the authority concerned shall pass appropriate order within a period of three weeks.
In case the petitioner deposits the compounded amount in the manner as mentioned above, the petitioner shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case for a period of three months from today. In default of moving the application as mentioned above and to deposit the amount as directed above, it shall be open to the Investigating Officer to arrest the petitioner.
With the above direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 25.4.2019 Ram Murti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajay Kumar Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 April, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Amit Kumar Pandey R V Pandey