Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

A.Govindaraju vs The Commissioner For Milk ...

Madras High Court|07 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by HULUVADI G.RAMESH,J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.
2. It appears that there is an order passed by this Court in W.A.No.86 of 2017, dated 14.02.2017, wherein six persons were allowed to participate in the counselling and the appellants also seek similar relief after filing an application for condonation of delay. It appears that the counselling is not yet completed. It is for the appellants to appear for counselling with all necessary certificates and since the appellants have already submitted applications before the authority, they are permitted to appear for counselling on 09.06.2017 with the other documents if need be for the purpose to satisfy the requirements. We hereby clarify that the appellants' case be considered only for the post for which they have applied. This order may be intimated to the second respondent by the Special Government Pleader.
With the above observations, this Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

A.Govindaraju vs The Commissioner For Milk ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
07 June, 2017