Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

A Nehru vs The District Collector And Others

Madras High Court|08 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the present writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
08.09.2017 Index:Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kkd To
1. The District Collector, Thiruvarur & District.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvarur & District.
3. The Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvarur & District.
4. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Thiruvarur & District.
W.P.No.31421 of 2005 and WMP.No.34445 of 2005 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

A Nehru vs The District Collector And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 September, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran