IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.9567 OF 2015 (L-TER) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.8732 OF 2016 (L-RES) IN WP.NO.9567/2015:
BETWEEN:
M/s. 3M India Limited, Concorde Block, UB City, No.24, Vittal Mallya road, Bengaluru – 560 001 Represented by its General Manager, ... Petitioner (By Sri.B.C.Prabhakar, Advocate) AND:
Sri.B.V.Mahesh, S/o. Vivekandaswamy, Aged about 37 years, Residing at No.28, 18th Cross, 1st Block, Visvapriya Nagar, Begur, Bengaluru – 560 068. ... Respondent (By Sri. Naik V.S., Advocate) The W.P.No.9567/2015 is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records leading to passing of the order dated 16.02.2015 passed by the Second Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru in I.D.No.23/2012 vide Annexure – G and etc., IN WP.NO.8732/2016:
BETWEEN:
B.V.Mahesh, S/o. Vivekandaswamy, Aged about 37 years, R/at No.28, 18th Cross, 1st Block, Visvapriya Nagar, Begur, Bengalauru- 560 068. ... Petitioner (By Sri. Naik V.S., Advocate) AND:
M/s. 3M India Limited, Concorde Block, UB City, No.24, Vittal Mallya Road, Bengaluru – 560 001 Represented by its General Manager. ... Respondent (By Sri.B.C.Prabhakar, Advocate) The W.P.No.8732/2016 is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the entire records from the 2nd Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru pertaining to Annexure – A and etc., These writ petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
The employer–M/s. 3M India Limited is before this Court calling in question the order of domestic enquiry (Issue No.1) which was passed on 16.02.2015 by II Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru in I.D.No.23/2012.
2. The workman has also filed another writ petition in WP.No.8732/2016 calling in question the order on I.A.No.1 in the very same dispute i.e. I.D.No.23/2012 seeking enhancement of interim relief which was granted by the Labour Court.
3. Learned counsel submits that the dispute before the Labour Court is in the final stage, as there was no interim stay on the validity of the domestic enquiry. Therefore, both the learned counsel submit that these matters may be disposed of, in view of passage of time.
4. In that view of the matter, these writ petitions are disposed of as they do not survive for consideration in the light of the observation made above.
SD/- JUDGE KTY.